MCP Tool-call Latency
DIFFERENTIATOR· sample data · production shapep50 / p95 / p99 latency per MCP endpoint (search · rates · book · static · vouchers · loyalty · flights). Shape comes from the open-source
liteapi-travel/mcp-server; timings here are simulated for the demo.MCP tool-call successi
98.10%
p50 latency · /searchi
108ms
p95 latency · /hotels/ratesi
412ms
Tool-call sequence lengthi
3.4
MCP endpoint latency · last 30 days (p95)
four busiest tools · timing middleware in a fork of liteapi-travel/mcp-server
/search/hotels/rates/bookings/flights
Success rate per MCP tool
last 7 days, sorted worst-first
99.73%
98.89%
98.17%
97.96%
97.73%
97.63%
97.49%
97.22%
p95 latency per MCP tool
last 7 days, sorted slowest-first
412ms
318ms
224ms
168ms
142ms
96ms
74ms
58ms
Why this is a differentiator OPEN-SOURCE WEDGE
No competitor publishes per-tool MCP latency, because no competitor open-sourced an MCP server. Forking
liteapi-travel/mcp-server and adding a 30-line timing middleware lets you expose these dashboards publicly at, say, mcp-status.liteapi.travel — instant developer-trust signal + recruiting flywheel.Sample data. Latency and success-rate numbers are deterministic synthetic data. Production version: fork the MCP server, add timing middleware, land timings into BigQuery via Vercel Edge logs (~2 days of work).